12.16: pos.addx/meta/need more review to decompose the system:
. what I've been calling addm because it's os-related,
should really be the domain of adda,
since the high-level language should include a portable os .
. as I was blogging addm articles starting back in 0906,
I noticed the naming was not updated for
allignment with the realization that
nearly everything could be done without addm,
so that low-level details were really part of adda
-- only the mechanics of serving bytecode or wordcode
would be the domain of addm .
No comments:
Post a Comment